tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4130770.post111816612812016911..comments2024-01-24T16:51:37.989-06:00Comments on L.A. Seitz of Chicago: Angels 4; Braves 2Seitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06027580090158303823noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4130770.post-1118206418012069802005-06-07T23:53:00.000-05:002005-06-07T23:53:00.000-05:00I've thought the same thing at times, so you could...I've thought the same thing at times, so you could be right. The 'soft' wasn't so much a characterization of the swing, but rather the flight of the ball.Seitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06027580090158303823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4130770.post-1118191051555881272005-06-07T19:37:00.000-05:002005-06-07T19:37:00.000-05:00Actually, I think McPherson's "soft liners" are ac...Actually, I think McPherson's "soft liners" are actually "hard bloopers." It strikes me that he hits the ball pretty damn hard all the time. He hits a pop-up, and it carries into the outfield. So maybe his soft liners are balls that other guys would hit for bloopers.<BR/><BR/>Or maybe I'm just wrong.The Chroniclerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02526767745800059836noreply@blogger.com